Org Web Adapter

journals/2026_06_11.org

ID
1405bd64-956c-460f-84b9-60360392b5b7

2026-06-11

Meetings

sprint112workhungryrootmeeting

DONE Hungryroot Book Club - What the River Knows

bookclub
ID
16c84423-97d7-9add-2546-5ace17ef1f03

Tasks

workhungryrootsprint112

DONE Figure out why migration checks are failing on cookbooks sharing branch

be7895chorecookbooksfavorites
ID
9a5c83c3-e6eb-959a-6e28-52e07f58b7dd

DONE Test backfill script on staging BE-7859

be7859investigationexp242cookbooksdata
ID
85c4e338-2a83-70ab-0f27-7e88c6d01074

Description

This has taken so long ... not even sure it's totally worthwhile, but I feel

like I should keep plugging away.

Notes

- Note taken on

Decision: meal_frequency backfill — skip for now

The exp_236 audit found 175 meal frequency mismatches and 25 rows (5

customers) with no quiz row at all. The question was whether to add a meal

frequency backfill to backfill_exp236_tags.py.

The CSV is a snapshot from June 4. Customers can update meal frequency anytime

via PATCH /api/customers/<id>/quizzes/. The Quiz model has no change history —

individual field updates aren't audited. This means mismatches between the CSV

and the DB are ambiguous: they could be a missing write (backfill needed) or a

legitimate customer update since June 4 (DB is correct).

Overwriting mismatches risks clobbering valid customer preferences. Creating

quiz rows for the 5 missing customers is also risky Quiz has many fields

beyond frequency; a partial row would be incomplete.

The backfill command stays as-is: only customer_tag rows are backfilled.

#+begin_src bash

claude --resume f0cb9d52-88c4-47b8-860b-1cd54d0e95e8

#+end_src